UPDATE: In a controversial move, the Southern California GOP delegation has rejected two resolutions aimed at limiting President Donald Trump‘s military actions in Latin America, particularly against Venezuela. The votes, which took place on October 25, 2023, underscore a growing divide within the party regarding the administration’s aggressive foreign policy.
The first resolution sought to prohibit the President from conducting military operations against groups he designated as terrorists—specifically drug cartels—without congressional authorization. This measure was defeated by a narrow margin of 216 votes against to 210 in favor. Representatives Ken Calvert, Young Kim, Jay Obernolte, and Darrell Issa voted against the resolution, supporting Trump’s approach to combating drug trafficking through military means.
Conversely, Representative Norma Torres condemned the President’s actions, stating,
“The president has no authority to launch military strikes without congressional approval… What we’re seeing is lawlessness.”
Torres, who voted in favor of the resolution, emphasized the need for cooperation over military intervention.
The second resolution aimed to prevent U.S. Armed Forces from engaging in hostilities against Venezuela without explicit congressional authorization. This resolution also failed, albeit with a closer vote of 213 against and 211 in favor. Representative Thomas Massie articulated the risks of unchecked military power, stating,
“When war-making power devolves to one person, liberty dissolves.”
Only three Republicans, including Massie, voted to uphold constitutional checks on presidential power.
These votes highlight a significant political tension within the GOP, as many members align themselves with Trump’s assertive stance on foreign policy despite concerns over the legality and morality of military actions. Critics argue that targeting drug traffickers with military force is a misguided and reckless strategy that could endanger lives without addressing the root causes of drug trafficking.
As the situation unfolds, the implications of these votes resonate beyond Congress. With ongoing hostilities in South America and Trump’s contentious policies, the decisions made in Washington could have lasting impacts on U.S. relations with Latin American countries and the ongoing battle against drug trafficking.
The failure of these resolutions raises urgent questions about the role of Congress in military decision-making and the future of U.S. involvement in Venezuela. Observers will be closely monitoring how this political landscape evolves, particularly as the 2024 elections approach.
This developing story is just one example of how political dynamics can shape foreign policy and military engagement, prompting calls for greater accountability and adherence to constitutional principles. As reactions from both sides of the aisle continue to unfold, the American public is left to ponder the implications of these decisions on national and global security.
