Emails recently uncovered by Fast Company reveal disturbing perspectives from the late financier Jeffrey Epstein regarding climate change and overpopulation. In a 2016 exchange with German philosopher and artificial intelligence researcher Joscha Bach, Epstein suggested that environmental degradation might serve as a solution to what he termed “overpopulation.” He articulated a chilling view, positing that climate change could be beneficial for humanity’s survival as a species.
Epstein’s correspondence included a striking statement: “Maybe climate change is a good way of dealing with overpopulation,” he wrote. He went on to discuss the potential benefits of natural disasters, implying that events like forest fires could contribute positively to the survival of the human species. His writing, marked by frequent typographical errors, expressed a disconcerting rationale for mass deaths: “too many people, so many mass executions of the elderly and infirm make sense is the fundamental fact that everyone dies at some time.”
The content of these emails has drawn criticism from various experts, including climatologist Michael Mann, who noted that such beliefs align disturbingly well with Epstein’s known associations. Mann characterized Epstein’s views as “entirely keeping with the ethos” of certain elites who disregard the gravity of climate change. He pointed to the notorious climate change skeptic Bjorn Lomborg, an associate of Epstein, as someone who has previously disseminated misleading information regarding environmental issues.
Mann particularly highlighted how Lomborg exploits his purported concern for the Global South while advocating for continued reliance on fossil fuels, a stance that disproportionately impacts those in developing nations who suffer the worst consequences of climate change.
The notion of “overpopulation” that Epstein referenced is not a new concept, yet it has been approached with a flawed perspective. The underlying issue is not merely the number of people on the planet, but rather the equitable distribution of resources. As nations achieve greater affluence, they typically experience declines in birth rates. This demographic transition can stabilize population growth without resorting to drastic measures.
Globally, the capacity to meet basic needs is evident; current food production levels could adequately nourish the global population. Nevertheless, around 673 million people face hunger daily. Similarly, the United States alone has seen approximately 771,000 individuals experience homelessness since 2007, despite a surplus of housing.
The critical challenge lies not in the sheer number of people but in ensuring equitable access to resources. Ironically, Epstein and his wealthy contemporaries often contribute to the inequalities that fuel such concerns. The wealth and resources they accumulate stand in stark contrast to the struggles faced by countless individuals worldwide.
This revelation adds to the growing body of evidence regarding Epstein’s troubling views and affiliations. In addition to his controversial opinions on environmental issues, Epstein maintained a bizarre obsession with human genetics, engaging with top scientists about improving human DNA.
The implications of these emails extend beyond Epstein’s personal beliefs; they reflect broader societal issues that demand urgent attention. Addressing inequality and ensuring sustainable resource distribution could provide viable solutions to the challenges posed by population dynamics and environmental change.
