UPDATE: A surprising revelation has emerged: former President George W. Bush outperformed California Governor Gavin Newsom on the SAT by a staggering 25 percent. This news is shaking up political discourse just as Newsom hints at a potential run for the 2028 presidential election.
In an eye-opening comparison, new data shows that Bush scored significantly higher on the SAT than Newsom, who recently disclosed his score of 960. This score falls below the national average, raising eyebrows and questions about the narrative surrounding both figures’ intelligence.
The implications of this revelation are profound. While Bush has often been mocked as the “dumbest president,” this new information could challenge that perception, particularly as Newsom prepares to launch his presidential campaign. In a recent interview, Newsom stated, “I’d be lying otherwise” if he said he wasn’t considering a run, indicating that he is positioning himself as a serious contender.
The SAT scores have reignited debates about education, privilege, and the qualifications required to lead the nation. Bush’s score, while not publicized as much, was reportedly above average for Yale, where he faced criticism for his admission. Comparatively, Newsom’s score has raised questions about his admission to Santa Clara University, where the average accepted student typically scores between 1360 and 1480.
Critics point out that Newsom’s success may have been aided by influential connections, including a recommendation from former California Governor Jerry Brown. Despite Newsom’s claims of a humble upbringing, public records and previous media features paint a different picture, suggesting he hails from a wealthy background.
This situation serves as a critical reminder of how education and privilege can shape political narratives. With Newsom’s soft-launch into the presidential race, the stakes are high. Voters are left to ponder the authenticity of his backstory amidst growing scrutiny over his academic achievements.
As the 2028 election cycle heats up, the focus will likely intensify on educational credentials and leadership capabilities. What happens next could have lasting implications for both candidates and their respective parties.
Stay tuned for more developments as the political landscape continues to shift. The conversation about intelligence, education, and leadership is far from over.
