Quentin Tarantino has stirred debate among film enthusiasts by expressing a preference for both the sequel and remake of the iconic horror film Psycho over Alfred Hitchcock’s original 1960 classic. In a recent discussion, Tarantino shared his views on Psycho, particularly focusing on its 1983 sequel, Psycho II, and the 1998 shot-for-shot remake by Gus Van Sant, which have received mixed reviews over the years.
Tarantino’s admiration for Psycho II is rooted in its unique narrative approach. Released just three years after Hitchcock’s death, the film was directed by Richard Franklin, who faced significant pressure from fans of the original film. Despite this, Psycho II performed well at the box office and has since gained a more favorable reputation. The film follows character Norman Bates, portrayed by Anthony Perkins, as he is released from a mental institution after 22 years, facing challenges as he attempts to rebuild his life.
The original Psycho is often credited with changing the landscape of horror cinema, largely due to its bold depiction of violence and psychological tension. Tarantino, however, has expressed reservations about Hitchcock’s films. On an episode of Eli Roth‘s *History of Horror* podcast, he stated that he has never been “overly enamored” with Hitchcock’s work, suggesting that the director was constrained by the cinematic norms of his time. He criticized the third acts of many Hitchcock films, claiming they “oftentimes … peter out.”
In contrast, Tarantino believes that the freedom afforded by the R-rated films of the 1980s allowed Psycho II to explore deeper character development. He remarked on Franklin’s ability to create a compelling narrative that elicited empathy for Norman Bates, turning the audience into supporters of his character rather than mere spectators of horror.
Tarantino’s appreciation for Psycho II extends beyond its plot; he has also defended Van Sant’s controversial remake. The 1998 film, which closely mirrored the original, was criticized upon its release but has found a niche audience over time. Tarantino has even screened it at his New Beverly Cinema in Los Angeles, showcasing his commitment to re-evaluating films that may not have received the recognition they deserve.
As Tarantino noted in an interview with writer Bret Easton Ellis, his cinematic preferences lean towards those filmmakers who have taken Hitchcock’s ideas further, including Brian De Palma and Richard Franklin. He elaborated on how these directors have pushed the boundaries of storytelling, creating works that resonate more with contemporary audiences.
While many film enthusiasts may still hold Hitchcock’s original Psycho in high regard, Tarantino’s outspoken views challenge conventional opinions regarding the film’s legacy. His preference for the sequel and remake highlights a broader conversation about artistic interpretation and the evolution of film over decades. As the film industry continues to revisit classic stories, Tarantino’s insights encourage a fresh perspective on how sequels and remakes can stand alongside their predecessors.
In the ongoing dialogue about cinema, Tarantino’s remarks serve as a reminder that film appreciation is subjective and can vary widely among audiences and critics alike. As the legacy of Psycho continues to unfold, both Psycho II and Van Sant’s remake may find their place in the hearts of viewers, thanks in part to the advocacy of passionate filmmakers like Tarantino.
