Political contributions have a profound impact on university leadership selections in Louisiana, according to a recent investigation by Tyler Bridges, an investigative reporter with *The Advocate*. The report reveals that Governor Jeff Landry played a significant role in the appointment of Wade Rousse as the 29th president of Louisiana State University (LSU), raising questions about the transparency of the selection process.
Bridges’ investigation highlights how Rousse’s rise to the presidency at LSU was heavily influenced by political donations and strategic connections. Kedrick A. Nicholas, senior vice president at McNeese State University, praised Rousse’s leadership, stating, “He has given his all to our institution for the last six years and deserves an opportunity to flourish at a higher level.” Rousse, who holds a Ph.D. in economics and previously served as the dean of the College of Business at McNeese, became president in July 2024 after overseeing notable growth at the university.
Landry’s endorsement of Rousse came with strong recommendations from influential figures, including Lee Mallett, a member of the LSU Board of Supervisors and a prominent political donor. Mallett described Rousse as possessing “bayou charm” and a deep understanding of the state’s culture and politics. However, it is essential for Louisiana citizens to recognize the implications of Landry’s recommendations, as he has also contributed to the selection of other university presidents.
Bridges notes that Landry’s influence extends beyond LSU, as he is positioned to select two more presidents at McNeese and the University of Louisiana at Lafayette. The governance of these institutions is meant to be independent, but Landry’s appointments to various university boards have raised concerns about political favoritism overshadowing merit-based decisions.
The governor’s ability to shape university leadership stems from a law passed last year that grants him the authority to appoint chairs to university boards responsible for selecting presidents. Notably, Landry appointed Mark Romero, an insurance executive and personal friend, as chair of the University of Louisiana board on June 5, 2024. Similarly, Scott Ballard, a businessman and substantial donor to Landry, became chair of the LSU Board of Supervisors in early January 2025.
Bridges’ report indicates that Romero expedited the selection process for former Louisiana Supreme Court Justice Jimmy Genovese as president of Northwestern State University, further illustrating Landry’s strategic maneuvering. Despite Landry’s claims of limited involvement, stating, “I have not played a role in the selection of any of these presidents,” the evidence suggests a more significant influence than he admits.
Political insiders and university officials, many of whom spoke on condition of anonymity due to the sensitive nature of the issue, expressed concern about the implications of Landry’s actions on the governance of higher education in Louisiana. Jay Dardenne, a former state senator and commissioner of administration under former Governor John Bel Edwards, emphasized, “The governance of a university ought to rest with the governing board rather than be a political favorite of the governor.” He warned that such political entanglement could potentially jeopardize the accreditation of universities.
Mallett’s efforts to support Rousse included organizing meetings with board members and business leaders, even chartering a private plane for Rousse to meet with key decision-makers. The investigation serves as a stark reminder of the intricate connections between political contributions and educational leadership in Louisiana.
As Louisiana continues to navigate these complex dynamics, the integrity of its higher education system may depend on a reevaluation of the influence exerted by political figures like Landry and the role of financial contributions in shaping university leadership.
