President Donald Trump intensified his argument for U.S. control over Greenland during a press conference on March 10, 2024. He characterized the island as crucial for American national security, asserting that the U.S. had historical ties to the region dating back over 300 years. His comments came shortly after the announcement of Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry as a special envoy to the semi-autonomous Danish territory, a decision that has sparked backlash from local officials.
Trump emphasized the strategic importance of Greenland, stating, “We need it for national protection.” He further claimed that the U.S. was not interested in exploiting the island’s mineral resources but aimed to counter the influence of Russia and China, countries he accused of increasing their naval presence in the area.
In an unusual remark, Trump referenced Denmark’s historical claims to Greenland, stating, “They say that Denmark was there 300 years ago or something with a boat. Well, we were there with boats too, I’m sure. So we’ll have to work it all out.” This statement overlooks the fact that the Inuit have inhabited Greenland for thousands of years, with European contact beginning in the late 10th century. The U.S. itself did not significantly engage with Greenland until the late 19th century.
Trump’s assertion that Denmark was not supporting Greenland is also misleading. The Danish government had previously announced a multi-year investment package of $253 million to support the island. This investment underscores Denmark’s ongoing commitment to Greenland, countering Trump’s claims of neglect.
Local officials have reacted strongly to Trump’s renewed interest in Greenland. In a joint statement, Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen and Greenlandic Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen emphasized the sovereignty of states, stating, “We have said it before. Now, we say it again: national borders and the sovereignty of states are rooted in international law. You cannot annex another country. Not even with an argument about international security.”
Denmark has also taken diplomatic steps in response to the situation, summoning the U.S. ambassador to Copenhagen for discussions. This reaction highlights the tension surrounding Trump’s comments and the broader implications for U.S.-Danish relations.
Earlier in his presidency, Trump’s administration had shown heightened interest in Greenland, with Vice President JD Vance visiting a U.S. base on the island in March 2024. At that time, Trump suggested he would not rule out using military force to secure the territory. Tensions further escalated in May when reports surfaced about increased U.S. spying efforts in Greenland, prompting Denmark to seek clarification from U.S. officials.
The recent developments signify a renewed focus on Greenland, a topic that had seemingly quieted down in late 2023. Prime Minister Frederiksen noted at that time that “there is perhaps a feeling that we can breathe a sigh of relief,” regarding U.S. intentions toward the island. However, with Trump’s latest statements, it appears the issue is once again at the forefront of international discourse.
As this situation evolves, it remains to be seen how it will affect the geopolitical landscape in the Arctic and the relationship between the United States, Denmark, and Greenland.
