UPDATE: A shocking report released by the Santa Clara County Office of Education has confirmed significant misuse of public funds under former superintendent Mary Ann Dewan. During a heated board meeting on Wednesday, officials revealed findings from a lengthy investigation that raises serious questions about financial practices within the office, highlighting a potential breach of trust with the community.
The investigation, which comes over a year after Dewan’s controversial removal in a 4-2 vote, details how the county’s Head Start program, designed to support low-income children under five, was mishandled. The report alleges that under Dewan’s leadership, the county misused more than $135,370 in federal funds. This mismanagement, described as a “failed cover-up” by the board, has sparked outrage among community members and current staff.
The board’s findings disclosed that public funds were improperly redirected for unrelated purposes, including legal expenses. Board president Maimona Afzal Berta and other officials noted that many contracts were awarded showing favoritism, undermining ethical standards. In response, Riju Krishna, president of the Association of County Educators, stressed that such significant financial misconduct could not rest solely on one individual, urging immediate policy reforms to restore accountability.
Dewan, defending her actions, called the board’s claims “meritless and baseless,” emphasizing that her work adhered to legal standards. “This pattern of public attacks is harmful to the institution,” she asserted in a statement.
Community reactions have been mixed. While some praised the board for investigating the misuse of funds, others expressed skepticism about the findings’ validity. Mercedes Hill, a Head Start office specialist, remarked, “The findings are astonishing but not surprising,” reflecting a sentiment shared by many who have raised concerns for years.
The board presented several recommended policy changes aimed at preventing future misuse, yet Tara Sreekrishnan, a board member, critiqued the proposed measures for centralizing authority and reducing transparency. “The findings raise serious concerns but lack specific evidence,” she stated, raising alarm about the implications for governance.
Meanwhile, former board members like Claudia Rossi came to Dewan’s defense, criticizing the investigation as a costly “witch hunt” that has yet to substantiate any wrongdoing. Current board member Don Rocha countered, stating, “The evidence speaks for itself unless you choose to look the other way,” emphasizing the need for accountability.
As the fallout from this investigation continues, the Santa Clara County Office of Education is under pressure to restore trust and ensure that such fiscal mismanagement does not recur. The community is watching closely for the board’s next steps in reforming policies and addressing these serious allegations.
Stay tuned for further developments as this story unfolds. The implications for the community and educational integrity are profound, and many are demanding answers NOW.
